beta
(영문) 부산지방법원 2017.04.13 2017노684

절도등

Text

The judgment below

Of them, the part against Defendant A shall be reversed.

Defendant

A shall be punished by imprisonment for eight months.

A seized A. 6.

Reasons

Summary of Reasons for appeal

A. The lower court’s sentence against Defendant A (10 months of imprisonment) is too unreasonable.

B. Defendant B (Defendant B) was aware of the fact that Defendant B took the possession of cash by intrusion upon the victim’s residence while serving as the “disposition for collection” of the Defendant B, and thus, Defendant B was found to have moved to the commission of the instant residential intrusion and theft by committing the instant act in consecutive order with the Defendant B and the non-name scam scam scam scam scam scam scam scam scam scam. However, the lower court acquitted Defendant B on the ground that it is difficult to view that Defendant B and the non-name scam scam scam scam scam scam scam scam scam scam scam scam s

Judgment on the Prosecutor’s misunderstanding of facts or misapprehension of legal principles as to Defendant B

A. The summary of this part of the facts charged is that the foreigner of Chinese nationality who is studying in Korea is a foreigner of the Chinese nationality, and that is living together in the studio located in the Busan Sho-gu.

Along with a false statement of “the act of larcenying crimes” which steals money and valuables by misrepresenting personal information to an investigative agency and a financial supervisory agency, the staff of the singing agent misrepresented the person who acts as the so-called “the act of collecting money and valuables,” which steals money and valuables, and directly steals cash upon intrusion upon the residence.

A, on November 22, 2016, up to the "D," which was posted by the winners of the name in the "D," which is a Chinese student's community site stationed in China.

’ 는 취지의 글을 보고 스마트 폰 어 플 리 케이 션인 ‘ 위 챗’ 을 통해 위 성명 불상자에게 연락한 다음 그로부터 ‘ 우리가 알려주는 주소지의...