beta
(영문) 서울중앙지방법원 2014.11.18 2013나49113

구상금

Text

1. Of the judgment of the court of first instance, 4,293,058 won and its related thereto are 5% per annum from November 29, 2007 to November 18, 2014, and 5% per annum.

Reasons

1. Facts of recognition;

A. The Plaintiff is an insurer who entered into an automobile insurance contract with the Plaintiff for DPoter II early storage cargo vehicles owned by C (hereinafter “Plaintiff”) and the Defendant, as the owner of the E-Vehicle (hereinafter “Defendant”), did not enter into liability insurance under the Guarantee of Automobile Accident Compensation Act with respect to the Defendant’s vehicle.

B. 1) On October 16, 2005, the Defendant driving the Defendant’s vehicle at around 00:30 on October 16, 2005, and driving the Defendant’s vehicle at a two-lane line in the vicinity of the Yong-dong Highway at the direction of the airside near the Yong-dong Highway (hereinafter “instant main road”).

(B) enter the two-lanes, while proceeding into the two-lanes, moving into the two-lanes of the two-lanes (hereinafter referred to as “instant entry roads”);

) After having entered the said road, the said road was going to go ahead of the route while proceeding again, and the said road was going to go to the instant road, and the said road and the instant road were to come to the instant main road in the direction of tent in the direction of visibility from the safety zone section in Manna. At the time, F was to enter the instant main road (hereinafter referred to as “small and medium vehicle”).

A driving of the main line of this case, the one lane of the main line of this case was driving from the chilling side to the chilling side, but the Defendant’s vehicle was trying to enter the main line of this case in the direction of visibility in the vicinity of the balkhal side of the front bank, making a full-scale internship in the direction of visibility, and making a rapid speed to reduce the speed, and driving along the road to the center separation zone by attaching the non-party’s vehicle to the left side of the Defendant vehicle, thereby preventing it from passing

H Driving the Plaintiff’s vehicle, driving the Plaintiff’s vehicle along the direction behind the Non-Party’s vehicle in the direction of visibility in the front direction. While attempting to enter the instant main road in the direction of visibility at the front direction, the Defendant’s vehicle discovered that the Non-Party’s vehicle is driving along the center separation zone while lowering the speed by avoiding it, and taking a brake measure.