정보통신망이용촉진및정보보호등에관한법률위반(명예훼손)
The prosecution of this case is dismissed.
The application for compensation order of this case shall be dismissed.
1. The summary of the facts charged is the reporter who served in the news gathering headquarters E.
피고인은 2012. 12. 9. 17:11경 D 인터넷 신문에 “호화 대저택 항공사진 F, 불법에 ‘그냥둬!’”라는 제목으로 게재한 기사가 사실임에도 불구하고, 인터넷 언론사 G 소속 기자인 피해자 C이 피고인 작성 위 ‘D’ 인터넷 신문 게재 기사가 오보라는 기사를 올리자 이에 대한 반박 기사 등을 게재하면서 피해자의 사생활에 관한 내용을 게재하기로 마음먹었다.
1. 피고인은 2012. 12. 10. 01:00경 “호화 대저택 항공사진 F, 불법에 ‘그냥 둬!’”라는 제목의 기사에 대한 추가 및 반박 보도문을 게재하면서 피해자를 비방할 목적으로 피해자를 지칭하면서 “전경 근무시절 선후임병을 성추행 혐의로 형사처벌을 받은 적도 있는 것으로 알려졌다.”라는 내용을 포함한 기사를 작성하여 D 인터넷 신문에 게재하였다.
2. On December 12:33, 2012, the Defendant posted an article in the name of “the representative reporter of “the Fluor” before and after military service,” and published it on the D Internet newspaper to the effect that “for the purpose of slandering the victim, the Defendant is a same-sex who has been punished for military service by force or by force by force.”
Accordingly, the defendant has damaged the reputation of the victim by divulging facts openly through the information and communication network for the purpose of slandering the victim.
2. Determination
A. Public prosecution concerning the dismissal of prosecution cannot be prosecuted against the victim's will explicitly manifested.
(1) Article 70(3) and (2) of the Act on Promotion of Information and Communications Network Utilization and Information Protection, Etc. (hereinafter “Information and Communications Network Utilization Act”). However, according to the written withdrawal of a complaint filed in the records, the victim agreed with the Defendant on November 13, 2013, which was the date of