beta
(영문) 부산지방법원 동부지원 2018.03.07 2017가단203000

손해배상(의)

Text

1. The plaintiff's claim is dismissed.

2. The costs of lawsuit shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

Reasons

1. Basic facts

A. On July 7, 2010, the Plaintiff was admitted to C Hospital operated by the Defendant (hereinafter “Defendant hospital”) on several occasions due to the pain pain, radioactive raying, light booming, and dogbing, and received psychotropic therapy and human propagation therapy from the Defendant. From September 3, 2010 to December 22, 2010, the Plaintiff received five inverte type surgery (a small skin was anesthesia on the part of the inverte body, and a small skin was 5m or less, and then was put into the bones of the injecte body, and received an operation to injecte cement with the injecte for injection. (hereinafter “each of the instant treatment”).

B. After that, the Plaintiff received psychotropical and human propagation treatment for more than three years due to pain pains in the Defendant Hospital, but since around 2014, the Plaintiff was not home to the Defendant Hospital, and the Defendant was again home to the Defendant hospital on January 20, 2015, which stated that “in the situation where he was found to be vain, he applied to vain, which is beyond vain as much as vaining from the stairs,” and the Defendant was diagnosed as “finites, finites, tensions, and tensions,” and performed pathic and human propagation treatment.

C. On the other hand, around April 2012, the Plaintiff was diagnosed at the Busan White Hospital annexed to the Incheon Madic University as falling under the Madics and Madicsia.

[Ground of recognition] In the absence of dispute, Gap evidence Nos. 1, Eul evidence Nos. 1 and 5 (including the number of branch offices)

2. Determination as to the cause of claim

가. 원고 주장의 요지 척추체 성형술은 골다공증성 압박골절, 종양에 의한 골절, 쿰멜 질환의 경우에만 실시되어야 함에도 불구하고, 피고는 앞서 든 원인들로 인한 것이 아니고 척추체 약화로 인한 통증을 겪고 있을 뿐인 원고에게 5차례에 걸쳐 척추체...