A. The judgment of the court below which acquitted the defendant on the robbery even if the credibility of the statement by the victim of mistake of fact is recognized, is erroneous in the misapprehension of facts which affected the conclusion of the judgment

B. The lower court’s sentencing (the amount of KRW 500,000 of a fine) is too unreasonable.

2. Determination

A. (1) The lower court determined that the victim’s statement (written statement of witness D, written statement of prosecutor’s office on D, written statement of prosecutor’s protocol of suspect interrogation of the police on D, written statement of prosecutor’s protocol of suspect interrogation of the police on the Defendant, written statement of DNA protocol of suspect interrogation of the police on the Defendant, and written statement of DNA protocol of suspect interrogation of the police on the Defendant) as evidence consistent with this part of the facts charged is a key issue that determines the credibility of the victim’s statement on the facts charged of this case, and acquitted the Defendant of this part of the facts charged

㈎ 피해자 진술의 신빙성에 대한 판단 1) 피해자의 진술내용 가) 진술서(증거기록 13면) 피해자는 경찰에 “피고인과 고스톱을 쳤는데, 피고인이 피고인의 돈을 다 따자 개평을 달라고 하여 3만 원을 주자 적다고 하며 더 달라고 하였고, 주지 않았더니 식당 내실에 있는 상 위에 나를 넘어뜨리고 내가 가지고 있던 현금 160만 원을 빼앗아 갔다.”는 내용의 진술서를 작성하여 제출하였다.

나) 경찰 피의자신문조서(증거기록 32-39면 피해자는 경찰에서 "피고인과 고스톱을 쳐서 제가 피고인의 돈을 땄는데, 피고인이 돈을 잃고 저한테 개평을 달라고 하여 제가 2만 원을 주니 피고인이 3만 원을 더 달라고 하여 제가 거절을 하였다.

Therefore, as the defendant carried a shoulder of his own self, carried a knife on the table, carried a knife a knife on the table, and knife a knife a knife on a knife that knife a knife and carried a knife, 2.10,000 won