When the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.

On October 6, 2016, at around 02:05, the Defendant: (a) reported at the entrance of the B apartment house door at 112, and sent to the site, and (b) sent D, a police officer affiliated with the Seocheon Police Station C police box, who called the Defendant’s spouse, separated the Defendant’s spouse from the Defendant and sent it to another place along with his wife; and (c) assaulted D, who tried to remove the less part of the working clothes of police officers D from the lower part of the police officer D’s working clothes.

Accordingly, the Defendant interfered with the legitimate execution of duties by police officers concerning the handling of 112 reported cases.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Statement made to D by the police;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes of E;

1. Relevant Article of the Criminal Act and Article 136 (1) of the Criminal Act concerning the selection of punishment;

1. Articles 70 (1) and 69 (2) of the Criminal Act for the detention of a workhouse;

1. The sentencing conditions indicated in the records, such as the defendant's age, occupation, character and conduct, family relationship, and circumstances before and after the crime, under Article 334(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act, of the provisional payment order, shall be determined as ordered by taking into account the following circumstances:

It interferes with the performance of official duties by assaulting a police officer dispatched after receiving a report, confessions that there has been two-time punishment for violent crimes, and reflects the fact, and the degree of the exercise of force is not much severe.