beta
(영문) 수원지방법원 2017.09.08 2017고단3066

위증

Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for not less than three months.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

[criminal records] On July 27, 2011, the Defendant was sentenced to three years and six months of imprisonment for fraud at the Daejeon District Court on August 30, 201, and completed the execution of the sentence at the Ansan Prison on August 30, 2014. On December 23, 2016, the Defendant was sentenced to imprisonment of one year and six months for fraud, and the judgment became final and conclusive on June 16, 2017.

[2] On September 7, 2016, the Defendant was present at the court of Suwon District Court No. 410, the Suwon District Court No. 4294, which was located in Suwon-si, Suwon-si, Suwon-si, Suwon-si, 120, as a witness of the fraud case No. 2016 High Order 4294 (hereinafter “the case subject to perjury”), and was urged to testify after being notified of the right to refuse to testify.

The defendant intentionally caused a traffic accident to the prosecutor's question "I did not intentionally cause a traffic accident to the witness."

The testimony of the witness refers to the answer of the counsel, "I will not answer the question," "I would like to say that the testimony of the witness was written on the vehicle operated by the witness at the time, but did not have been recruited as in B."

The testimony was made to the effect that there was no fact of committing an insurance fraud in collusion with B, such as responding to the question “A,” stating that there was no part at all involved in the insurance fraud of the instant case.”

However, in fact, the defendant and B conspired with each other to cause a traffic accident intentionally, did not cause a particular injury due to an accident, and acquired the insurance money by claiming the insurance company without any damage.

Accordingly, the defendant made a false statement contrary to his memory and raised perjury.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. A protocol of examination of the witness to the defendant in the third trial protocol for the case subject to perjury;

1. Court rulings and appellate court rulings on cases subject to perjury;

1. Previous convictions in judgment: A reply to inquiries, such as criminal history, a report of investigation (Attachment to the same type of judgment; and