업무상횡령
The defendant shall be innocent.
1. Around March 2006, the Defendant was unable to pay part of the cost of goods supplied by the victim due to the default of household checks, etc., while he was supplied with electronic equipment, such as Macons, from E operation of the victim D and sold them. From April 2006, the Defendant agreed to transfer the cost of goods deposited to the account in the name of the Defendant’s wife’s name to the victim when the victim was supplied to the customer designated by the Defendant.
On the other hand, the defendant received goods from other goods suppliers in addition to the victim, and in the case of the above goods, the defendant agreed to pay the remaining money to the goods suppliers with the exception of the 7-10% margin of the defendant.
From April 2006 to December 3, 2007, the Defendant calls from the victim and other goods suppliers to inform the victim and other goods suppliers of the address in which they are their customers, thereby allowing them to supply quantityless electronic and electronic equipment, and the same year.
4. Around 20.20. Around December 3, 2007, the sum of KRW 245,997,400, as stated in the list of offenses, including a sum of KRW 74,790,00,000, which was remitted to the victim as a price for goods; KRW 42,188,500, which was delivered to the victim as a list of payment for goods; KRW 108,58,000, remitted to trading companies other than the victim; KRW 10,858,00,00, which was remitted to trading companies other than the victim; and KRW 10,58,90,00, remaining after deducting KRW 9,580,90 (total sum of KRW 245,97,400, KRW 1080, KRW 5080, KRW 7080, KRW 808, KRW 1008, KRW 708,008, KRW 108,5008.
2. One-time defendant.