A shall be punished by a fine of 500,000 won, and a fine of 700,000 won, respectively.

The above fine is imposed against the Defendants.

1. On May 2, 2014, Defendant A, at around 17:30, notified the result of the council of occupants’ representatives in Nam-gu, Nam-gu, Gwangju, and reported by 10 residents in the course of the victim E and the trial with the victim E, the Defendant publicly insulting the victim by openly insulting the victim.

2. Defendant B

A. On May 2, 2014, at around 17:30 on May 2, 2014, the Defendant, based on false facts, reported by the victim E and 7 residents at the entrance of the Nam-gu Seoul Southern-gu 102 Do Man-gu 102 entrance, thereby undermining the victim’s reputation by openly pointing out false facts, although there was no fact that the Defendant forced the security guards to be subject to compulsory resignation, forced resignation, and forced resignation, even though there was no young gue, thereby undermining the victim’s reputation.

B. In the process of brushing at the above time and place, the Defendant publicly insulting the victim E by openly insulting the victim by “Is the victim by spiting the victim E, including “Is the young gushes that are not separate, flusium flusium, flusium, flusium, flusium, flusium, flusium, flusium, and flusium.”

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendants’ respective legal statements

1. Statement to E by the police;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes governing recording records;

1. Article relevant to the facts constituting an offense and the selection of punishment;

A. Defendant A: Article 311 of the Criminal Act; Selection of fine

B. Defendant B: Article 307(2) of the Criminal Act (a point of defamation), Article 311 of the Criminal Act (a point of insult), and the selection of each fine

1. Defendant B from among concurrent crimes: former part of Article 37, Articles 38 (1) 2 and 50 of the Criminal Act;

1. Defendants to be detained in the workhouse: each criminal law.