2. Although there are circumstances to consider the circumstances, such as the fact that the defendant committed the instant crime for the purpose of preparing living expenses, etc., the defendant committed repeatedly the instant crime under the same several Acts during the period of repeated crime resulting therefrom despite having been punished several times for the same kind of crime, and does not make efforts to recover damage to the victims, and taking into account all the sentencing conditions in the instant pleadings, including the defendant’s age, character and conduct, the background and consequence of the instant crime, and the circumstances after the crime, etc., even if considering the circumstances of the defendant’s assertion, it cannot be said that the sentence of the court below is too unreasonable.

3. In conclusion, the defendant's appeal is dismissed in accordance with Article 364 (4) of the Criminal Procedure Act since it is without merit. It is so decided as per Disposition.