손실보상금
1. The defendant's appeal is dismissed.
2. The costs of appeal shall be borne by the Defendant.
Purport of claim and appeal
1..
1. The reasoning of the judgment of the court of first instance cited by the defendant at the trial does not differ from the argument in the court of first instance, and even if the evidence submitted at the court of first instance showed the evidence No. 13, the judgment of the court of first instance, which partially accepted the plaintiff's claim, is justified.
Accordingly, the reasoning for this case is as follows. The court added the "Guide 2" under the second sentence of the judgment of the court of first instance, the "this court" under the second sentence of the court of first instance, the "No. 4, No. 12, and No. 6, and the "this court" under the second sentence of the court of first instance, the "No. 18," the "No. 3-5," the "No. 6," the "No. 7," the "No. 3-5," and the "No. 8, the second sentence of the court of first instance" under the former Enforcement Decree of the National Land Planning Act, the "No. 5," the "No. 1, the second sentence of the court of first instance," the "No. 4, the second sentence of the court of first instance," the "No. 9, the second sentence," and the "No. 1, the second sentence of the judgment," the "No. 9, the second sentence of the Civil Procedure Act," other than the "No. 1, the second sentence.
2. If so, the judgment of the court of first instance is just, and the defendant's appeal is dismissed as it is without merit.