(a) Business name - Business name: Hanam-si Urban Development Project (hereinafter referred to as the “instant project”) - Project execution site: 155,713 square meters in Seoul-si: Defendant - Public Notice D of Gyeonggi-do on December 31, 2012, and public notification E on January 9, 2015

(b) The Gyeonggi-do local Land Tribunal’s ruling on expropriation on May 26, 2015 - The date of expropriation: July 10, 2015 - Land to be expropriated (hereinafter “each land of this case”) and obstacles (hereinafter “in this case”) indicated in the column for “land subject to expropriation” in the attached Table owned by the Plaintiff located in the project area of this case - Compensation: A total of KRW 4,369,631,50, as indicated in the attached Table “the result of the appraisal of expropriation” in the attached Table - An appraisal corporation and an appraisal corporation for two appraisal corporations.

C. The Central Land Tribunal’s ruling on June 23, 2016 - Compensation: The appraisal corporation shall calculate the sum of KRW 4,616,385,500 as indicated in the attached Table “the result of the appraisal of this ruling” as indicated in the attached Table 1 - An appraisal corporation: Uniform Appraisal Corporation, one appraisal corporation, and one appraisal corporation (hereinafter “an appraiser of this ruling”), and the said appraisal (hereinafter “an appraisal of this ruling”).

D. The result of the appraisal commission to the appraiser F of this Court (hereinafter referred to as the "appraisal of the court," and the result of the appraisal commission to the court: The result of the appraisal commission to the court: 4,368,360,000 won in the case where the specific use area is a natural green area or a development-restricted area, 5,593,360,000 won in the case of each of the instant land, and 309,563,200 won in the case of the instant obstacles (specific details are as stated in the column for the result of the court appraisal as shown in the attached Table 3), without dispute, the facts that there is no dispute about the appraisal of the instant obstacles at KRW 309,563,20 in the case of the instant land (the specific contents are as stated in the column for the result of the court appraisal), Gap evidence Nos. 1, 3, Eul evidence Nos. 5, 10,

2. The plaintiff's assertion of objection is ruled.