게임산업진흥에관한법률위반
[Defendant A] The defendant shall be punished by imprisonment with prison labor for one year and six months.
However, the above sentence shall be executed for a period of two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.
Punishment of the crime
"2015 Highest 6972"
1. No one who operates a game product-related business shall allow a game business entity to play gambling or perform other speculative acts by using game water, or leave the game business entity to do so;
Nevertheless, from June 9, 2014 to April 24, 2015, the Defendant installed a 56 game machine with the Dokdo, the Dok-do, the Dok-do, the Dok-do, the Dok-do, and the KON-do to unspecified customers in the "F Game site" in Busan Northern-gu, Busan-gu, Busan-do, and caused them to perform speculative acts, such as having customers exchange a certificate of keeping points with cash, or having them perform such speculative acts, if customers request to issue a certificate of keeping points equal to those acquired.
2. From April 20, 2015, Defendant B served as an employee on condition that he would receive 6-80,000 won per day in the above game room from around April 20, Defendant B, despite being aware that A issued a certificate of keeping points in the above game room and issued a certificate of keeping points in the above game room, Defendant B confirmed and settled the scores of many unspecified customers in the game room, and made it easy for Defendant A to commit the above crime by cleaning and using the game room.
Accordingly, the Defendant aided and abetted the violation of the Act on Promotion of Game Industry listed in the above paragraph (1).
"2015 Highest 8741"
1. No one shall provide for the distribution or use of, or display or store for, game products, the contents of which are different from those of the rating, and no game products-related business entity shall allow others to engage in gambling or other speculative acts using game products, or leave the game products to do so;
Nevertheless, although the defendant is a written complaint of 2015, it is obvious that the defendant is a clerical error in the book of 2015 in light of the content of the case.
In addition, it is recognized to reduce the period so that there is no impediment to the defendant's right of defense.
5. From around 27. to June 1, 2015.