However, the execution of the above sentence shall be suspended for a period of two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

1. On October 30, 2015, the Defendant: (a) 00:0 on Seopo-si, Seopo-si, Seopo-si; (b) on October 30, 2015, the Defendant was taking a taxi operated by the victim B at the time, and (c) despite the Defendant did not wish to pay the taxi normally, the Defendant appeared to have the same attitude as the Defendant would pay the taxi normally; and (d) on that day, the Defendant obtained pecuniary benefits equivalent to KRW 3,600 by allowing the victim to reach the D District, the purpose of the Defendant at around 00:15.

2. On October 30, 2015, the Defendant: (a) discovered that the slope F, working in the said district group, was in front of the Seogpo Police Station D District, Seopo-si, Seopo-si, Seopo-si, Sinpo-si, Sinpo-si; (b) discovered that the sloping F, working in the said district group, carried a suspect for other cases; and (c) without any reason, interfered with the police officer’s legitimate performance of public duties concerning the maintenance of order by the police officer.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Statement made by the police with regard to F;

1. B written statements;

1. Application of the Acts and subordinate statutes governing walling and photographing photographs of the person against whom the receipt is 1;

1. Relevant legal provisions of the Criminal Act, Articles 347(1) and 136(1) of the Criminal Act (the point of fraud), the choice of punishment for the crime, and the choice of imprisonment, respectively;

1. The former part of Article 37 of the Criminal Act, and Articles 38 (1) 2 and 50 of the same Act, which aggravated concurrent crimes;

1. The grounds for sentencing under Article 62(1) of the Criminal Act for the suspended sentence under Article 62(1) of the Act on the Suspension of Execution are as follows: (a) a crime (Fraud in favor of the reasons for sentencing) [the scope of the recommended sentence] under Article 62(1) of the Act on the Suspension of Execution [the scope of the punishment] and Article 62(1) of the Act on the Suspension of Execution [the scope of the punishment] (the scope of the recommended sentence] under Article 1 of the Act on the Suspension of Execution of Public Duties in the basic area (the scope of the punishment which is not punishable or has been restored to a considerable amount of damage (the special mitigated person] [the scope of the punishment] under Article 62(1) and Article 62(1) of the Act on the Suspension of Execution of Public Duties, and there is no person who has been sentenced to suspended sentence of imprisonment for a crime, such as the obstruction of the execution of public duties in the past.