beta
(영문) 서울동부지방법원 2013.12.02 2013고단1977

사기

Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for a term of one year and two months.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

[Criminal Power] On September 19, 2007, the Defendant was sentenced to imprisonment with prison labor for one year and six months, and three years of probation at the Jeju District Court, and the said judgment became final and conclusive on the 28th of the same month.

[2013 Highest 1977]

1. The Defendant jointly committed the crime with D in relation to the victim C, when it was difficult for a lighting fixture seller, who operated around 2005, to suffer economic difficulties, such as dishonoring. Around August 2006, the Defendant conspiredd with D and D, a broker broker, to obtain money from the victim C under the pretext of forging a service contract for a brin restaurant at the construction site by forging it falsely and using it by using it.

In fact, the Defendant did not have concluded a service contract with the Korea National Housing Corporation and SK Construction Corporation, the Sinsan Urban Construction Site at the time of the construction site of the new city of the ASEAN, and there was no economic difficulty, and even if the Defendant received the money from the victim C, it was merely intended to use the Defendant’s rapid living expenses, etc., and did not intend or have ability to transfer the Defendant’s right to operate the restaurant, the Defendant forged one copy of the service contract with D around August 2006 under the name of the president of the Korea National Housing Corporation, the head of the regional district of the Asia, the EK Construction Company, and the F of the F of the Korea National Housing Corporation. On August 206, 2006, D would make profits to the Defendant’s pro-gu office located near the H farm Station located in the Gangnam-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government, and it was possible for the victim and the victim’s employees to make up for the amount of KRW 3.6 billion prior to the operation of the restaurant at the 2nd Do.

At that time, since the executives of the Housing Corporation have been dystyed many times, there is no problem about this business.