2. The costs of lawsuit are assessed against the plaintiffs.

A. The Defendant engaged in the mms management of the Plaintiff A Co., Ltd. (hereinafter “Plaintiff”). On September 14, 201, the Defendant made double withdrawal to exceed KRW 48,168,100 in the customer’s ms account, 1,453, while making mscams on September 14, 201.

(hereinafter referred to as "intermediancy case"). (b)

Accordingly, the Plaintiff Company returned all of the accounts deposited in double withdrawal, and the cancellation due to double withdrawal was about 0 cases until September 17, 201.

C. On September 19, 201, the Defendant was demoted to the chief of the general affairs division on his behalf due to double withdrawal cases.

[Ground of recognition] Facts without dispute, Gap evidence 1, Eul evidence 4-1 to 3, the purport of the whole pleadings

2. Judgment on the grounds of the plaintiffs' claims

A. In the case of double withdrawal by the Defendant’s decision on the Plaintiff Company, the Plaintiff Company refunded KRW 2,279,100 to its superior members by cancelling the mutual aid agreement, and the Plaintiff Company suffered losses to its business in the future due to the loss of the image of the Plaintiff Company and the loss of trust by its members. Therefore, the Defendant sought consolation money from the Plaintiff Company, but, in principle, it is difficult to recognize mental suffering from the Plaintiff Company, and the Plaintiff Company’s assertion appears to seek compensation for non-property damage. In light of the fact that the Plaintiff Company’s compensation for non-property damage is claimed.

The plaintiff company asserts that it is obligated to compensate for 25,000,000 won.

As seen earlier, in light of the fact that the cancellation due to the double withdrawal case by the Plaintiff Company on September 17, 201, the number of cases is zero, the entry of the evidence No. 2, alone, rescinded the mutual aid agreement by 27 members due to the Defendant’s double withdrawal case.

It is insufficient to recognize that the Plaintiff’s image was lost or the Plaintiff’s member’s trust was lost, and there is no other evidence to acknowledge it. Thus, the Plaintiff’s above assertion is without merit.

B. Plaintiff B’s assertion of judgment as to Plaintiff B.