If the defendant does not pay the above fine, KRW 100,000.

피고인은 2015. 12. 25. 20:00 경 서울 광진구 B에 있는 피해자 C( 남, 45세) 이 운영하는 ‘D 식당’ 앞 도로를 술에 취한 채 지나가다 아무런 이유 없이 발로 위 식당 출입문을 수회 걷어찼다.

The Defendant, who was the victim of this case, “dwark,” and prevented this, made the door closed after being discovered of the arbitr, kin, and inside.

“Absinging and taking a bath,” and continued to enter a restaurant with approximately 25 minutes, and putting the smokeway in a restaurant, which led customers on the eating process, to the end.

Accordingly, the defendant interfered with the victim's restaurant business by force.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement made by the police against C;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes to investigative reports (the statement of telephone conversations E by a wooden person);

1. Article 314 of the Criminal Act applicable to the crime, Article 314 (1) of the Criminal Act, the selection of fines, and the selection of fines;

1. Article 70(1) and Article 69(2) of the Criminal Act to attract a workhouse;

1. Article 334 (1) of the Criminal Procedure Act concerning the order of provisional payment;