On March 21, 2019, the Defendant was sentenced to imprisonment with prison labor and six months at the Seoul Western District Court on March 21, 201, and the judgment became final and conclusive on the 27th of the same month.

1. On July 25, 2018, the Defendant: (a) around July 25, 2018, the victim, a representative of Yeongdeungpo-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government, is deemed to be C, not C; and (b) the victim shall be corrected ex officio.

At the office, C told C to the effect that “The E has received an order for the F system building service business in the amount of KRW 4.6 billion, which is equivalent to KRW 1.9 billion from which the LAD may receive an order for the project equivalent to KRW 1.9 billion from among them, the amount of KRW 1.9 billion shall be changed to the advance business cost.”

However, the Defendant did not have the intent or ability to receive an order from the Plaintiff even if the Defendant received the aforementioned advance business fees from the victim, and the Defendant took the Defendant’s debt of KRW 15 million with respect to G with bad credit, and KRW 40 million with respect to H.

As above, the Defendant, by deceiving the victim and deceiving the victim, obtained the victim each payment of KRW 5.4 million from the victim on August 28, 2018, KRW 2.0 million on October 25, 2018, and KRW 3 million on November 21, 2018 from the company bank account in the name of I. < Amended by Act No. 15083, Nov. 21, 2018>

2. On October 26, 2018, at the D office of the Dispute Resolution Co., Ltd., the Defendant: (a) around October 26, 2018, at the order form in which the seal of the Dispute Resolution Co., Ltd., was stored in the file form with the seal of the Dispute Resolution Co., Ltd., using the computer, and stored in the file form: (b) on October 26, 2018: H, telephone, facsimile: M, representative: N, etc. of Geumcheon-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government, arbitrarily entered and output it; and (c) the Defendant arbitrarily created by the N name and printed it.

Accordingly, the defendant has forged an order form in the name of the E E, a private document concerning rights and obligations without authority for the purpose of exercising.

3. The Defendant is a document duly formed one of the forged orders, as provided in paragraph 2, to C, who is aware of the forgery at a time and place as referred to in paragraph 2.