However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for two years from the date this judgment became final and conclusive.

The Defendant is a person who operates a firm manufacturing building materials with a trade name “C” in Kimhae-si B.

No person shall employ a person who is not eligible to sojourn in the Republic of Korea to engage in job-seeking activities, but the defendant shall do so from April 1, 2013 to the same year.

5. 8. Around that time, a foreigner employed 60,000 won per day as an employee of the Republic of Korea, who did not have the capacity to engage in job-seeking activities, as indicated in the list of crimes, as an employee, who had no capacity to engage in job-seeking activities by 15.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. A written accusation;

1. A copy of each statement of a foreigner;

1. A copy of a decision on examining an immigration offender, a copy of a certificate of foreign employment, and application of each statute;

1. Article 94 subparagraph 9 of the Immigration Control Act and Article 18 (3) of the same Act (Selection of Imprisonment) concerning the applicable criminal facts and the choice of punishment;

2. Of concurrent crimes, the former part of Article 37, Articles 38 (1) 2 and 50 of the Criminal Act;

3. Suspension of execution under Article 62 (1) of the Criminal Act (the confession and reflectment of each of the crimes in this case, and the motive and circumstances of each of the crimes in this case, and the circumstances after the commission of the crime, etc.);