도로교통법위반(무면허운전)
The prosecutor's appeal is dismissed.
1. In light of the fact that the defendant had been punished several times due to the violation of the Road Traffic Act or the violation of the Road Traffic Act (eight times a fine and two times a suspended sentence of imprisonment) in the past, etc., the summary of the grounds for appeal (two years a suspended sentence in six months, and two times a suspended sentence of probation and community service order) of the court below is too unreasonable.
2. Taking into account the circumstances alleged by the judgment prosecutor, the Defendant confessions and reflects, and the crime of this case does not cause traffic accidents due to the operation of the instant vehicle by simpleless driving, and the Defendant’s disposal of one’s own vehicle to avoid recidivism in the future, the Defendant is in a position to support his mother and two children, and other circumstances, including the Defendant’s character and conduct and environment, the background and result of the instant crime, the circumstances after the crime, etc., and the sentencing conditions specified in the records and arguments, are considered as inappropriate. Thus, the prosecutor’s allegation above is without merit.
3. In conclusion, the prosecutor's appeal is dismissed as it is without merit. It is so decided as per Disposition.