Where the defendant fails to pay the above fine, one hundred thousand won shall be one day.

On November 5, 2014, around 23:00, the Defendant assaulted the victim E and the victim’s flab at the end of the so-called Seo-gu, Daejeon-gu, Daejeon-gu, by cutting off and pushing ahead his flab at the victim E and the end of the so-called flab.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Each legal statement of witness F, G, and E;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes to recording notes;

1. Relevant Article 260 of the Criminal Act concerning the facts constituting an offense, Article 260 (1) of the Criminal Act selection of punishment, and selection of fines;

1. Article 70(1) and Article 69(2) of the Criminal Act to attract a workhouse;

1. The summary of the facts charged under Article 334(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act, the Defendant, as indicated in the facts of the crime in the judgment, had the victim flabed and pushed the flab with flab, and walked flab with the face and hot body at a time, and flabed and walked with the victim 14 days in demand of treatment.

Judgment

As evidence corresponding to the above facts charged, the victim's statement and injury diagnosis in this court and investigative agency are provided.

However, in full view of the following circumstances acknowledged by the evidence duly adopted and examined by this court, it is insufficient to recognize the fact that the Defendant, with the sole evidence of each of the above evidence alone, took the victim’s face and body at a time and walking so that he/she could take care of about about 14 days, and there is no other evidence to prove the above facts charged.

The victim, at this court and investigative agency, completed the first drinking place with the Defendant and F, and was in the second drinking place with the Defendant and F, on the ground that the victim was f and F on the ground that the victim took a place while making independent telephone conversations with other people. However, the Defendant stated to the effect that approximately 30 minutes of the victim was 20 times more than 20 minutes.

그런 데 피해자는 수사기관에서는 피고인이 피해자의 멱살을 잡아 벽으로 찧고, 허벅지와 팔을 때렸다고

The defendant made a statement in this Court.