However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

On September 24, 2019, around 02:06, the Defendant: (a) committed assault, such as: (b) checking the personal information from E, who was reported by the police officer belonging to the said patrol group, and taking off from the taxi, on one occasion, using the left hand of E at one time, pushing away from the right hand of the said patrol group; (c) keeping the chest, pusheding the breast, frighting the breast, and frighting the baby, which was reported by the Defendant, that the Defendant does not have to leave the taxi after getting on the taxi of the said patrol group under the influence of alcohol.

Accordingly, the Defendant interfered with the legitimate execution of duties by police officers concerning 112 reporting handling duties.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Statement of the police statement of E;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes of D;

1. Article 136 (1) of the Criminal Act applicable to the crimes;

1. Article 62 (1) of the Criminal Act;

1. The reasons for sentencing under Article 62-2 of the Social Service Order Criminal Act include the defendant's age, character and conduct, family relationship, home environment, motive and means of crime, and circumstances that form the sentencing conditions indicated in the records of this case, such as the following circumstances: the defendant's age, character and conduct, family relation, home environment, motive and means of crime, etc., shall be determined as ordered