except that the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

On July 26, 2006, the Defendant issued a false statement to the victim D, stating that “The Defendant would have repaid 22 million won in installments for six months if he/she borrowed money from another person due to the lack of property or income,” and that “The Defendant would have repaid 22 million won to him/her for six months if he/she borrowed money from another person.” The Defendant received 22 million won from the victim.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Application of the police statement law to D;

1. Article 347 (1) of the Criminal Act applicable to the crimes;

1. Article 62 (1) of the Criminal Act (agreement, reflectment, etc.);