If the defendant does not pay the above fine, KRW 100,000.

Around 20:00 on October 2, 2019, the Defendant driven a B K7 car and operated a two-lane in accordance with the distribution channel in Seocho-gu Seoul Seocho-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government as the distribution channel. On the ground that D taxi driven by the victim C (year 56) interferes with the Defendant’s proceeding, the Defendant threatened the victim by setting the speed of the Defendant’s vehicle, setting the speed of the Defendant’s vehicle and reducing the speed by operating the brake system, without turning the direction light.

Accordingly, the defendant carried dangerous objects and threatened the victim.

Summary of Evidence

1. Legal statement of the defendant C by the defendant's partial statement;

1. The police's statement of each police interrogation protocol against the defendant and C;

1. Results of each of the statements on the current occurrence of each traffic accident and the results of each of the current status of retaliation and scarcity driving;

1. The defendant and his defense counsel's assertion pointing out the circumstances unrelated thereto is not accepted (In this case where the victim's statement and the black image are consistent with the situation of the crime, for example, before and after the crime committed, the victim interfered with the defendant's progress before and after the crime committed by the defendant, because the taxi that the defendant was driving by the defendant was moving the above taxi that was going on the speed of the vehicle that the defendant driven by the defendant, because the taxi did not properly change the vehicle line and interfered with the progress of the vehicle that he driven by the defendant, and immediately after the operation of the brake system without any special reasons, it can be sufficiently recognized that the defendant caused the victim who driven the above taxi to feel uneasiness and uneasiness.