야간건조물침입절도등
A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for not less than eight months.
However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for two years from the date this judgment became final and conclusive.
Punishment of the crime
1. Around 18:00 on March 9, 2013, the Defendant: (a) opened a door to the “E” office of the victim D’s “E” office in Gangnam-si; (b) opened a material warehouse using the said warehouse heat; and (c) operated a section of approximately 3 km back to the said cargo vehicle by driving the said cargo vehicle again by driving the said cargo vehicle up to the outside of the Defendant’s money unit located in Gangseo-si G by using the said cargo keys; (d) opened a material warehouse using the said storage heat; and opened a material warehouse; and (e) opened the said container; and (e) operated a vehicle with eight points at the market price of 4,00,000 won at the victim’s own storage; and (e) loaded the FF vehicle without the victim’s consent; and (e) loaded the cargo vehicle onto the outside of the Defendant’s money unit located in Gangnam-si G by using the said cargo keys.
In addition, from March 9, 2013 to April 18, 2013, the Defendant intruded the victim's above office and material storage two times in the same manner, such as the list of offenses, and carried the victim's property into the above office and material storage on the above cargo vehicle, and returned to the above office by driving the above cargo vehicle again.
Accordingly, the Defendant, like the No. 1 in the annexed list No. 1, stolen the property of the victim by impairing the victim's structure, and intruded the victim's structure at night, such as the annexed list No. 2, and stolen the property of the victim, and used the victim's vehicle temporarily as shown in the annexed list No. 1 and No. 2.
2. On April 18, 2013, at around 23:00 on April 18, 2013, the Defendant causing property damage: (a) the Defendant’s crime of theft was committed in the “E” office as indicated in paragraph (1); (b) the Defendant’s crime of theft was discovered by CCTV video products; and (c) the Defendant forced the Defendant to take the Kamerra line of closed-circuit (CCTV video devices) owned by the victim by hand to cut off approximately KRW 200,00,000, the market price owned by the victim.