When the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.

On May 2012, the Defendant heard the victim C’s house located in the Hanam-dong, Hanam-gun, and the victim’s speech that he had been employed as a temporary employee from the victim’s house in D where son was presented by son, and the victim stated to the effect that “The Defendant may employ 30 million won as a regular employee by drinking son. First of all, 7 million won as a starting fee is changed.”

However, in fact, the defendant thought that he will use the money received from the victim for his personal purpose, and he did not have any intention or ability to employ the victim's children as a full-time staff D using the money as expenses.

The Defendant deceptioned the victim as above, and received 7 million won in cash from the victim around that time.

Summary of Evidence

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes of police statement protocol to C

1. Relevant provisions of the Criminal Act concerning the facts constituting an offense and Article 347 (1) of the Criminal Act selecting a penalty;

1. Articles 70 (1) and 69 (2) of the Criminal Act for the detention of a workhouse;

1. It is so decided as per Disposition for not less than Article 334(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act.