When the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.

No person shall issue a transaction request in electronic financial transactions or transfer a means of access used to secure the authenticity and accuracy of users and the details of such transaction.

Nevertheless, around March 31, 2014, the Defendant, through Kwikset Service Articles, sent the passbook and cash card, which is the means of electronic financial transactions of the Defendant’s agricultural bank account (C) and the community credit cooperative account (D) to the bearer of Kwikset Service.

Accordingly, the Defendant transferred the means of access.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Statement to E by the police;

1. Transfer certificate and replys to a seizure warrant;

1. Application of each of the statutes in one copy to the Agricultural Cooperative Account under the name of the defendant and the community credit cooperatives account information;

1. Article 49 (4) 1 and Article 6 (3) 1 of the Electronic Financial Transactions Act concerning facts constituting an offense;

1. Articles 40 and 50 of the Criminal Act of the Commercial Concurrent Crimes;

1. Selection of an alternative fine for punishment;

1. Articles 70 (1) and 69 (2) of the Criminal Act for the detention of a workhouse;

1. It is so decided as per Disposition for not less than Article 334(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act.