교통사고처리특례법위반
The judgment of the court below is reversed.
Defendant shall be punished by imprisonment without prison labor for six months.
However, the above punishment shall be imposed for a period of two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.
1. The summary of the grounds for appeal (misunderstanding of the legal principle) dismissed the public prosecution of this case on the ground that the Defendant was covered by a comprehensive insurance policy even though the victim was “the risk of life due to bodily injury has occurred or the risk of death has become unknown or the disease has occurred due to influence or influence.” The court below erred by misapprehending the legal principles, which affected the remaining decision
2. Determination
가. 원심이 적법하게 채택하여 조사한 증거들에 의하여 인정되는 다음과 같은 사정들 즉, ① 피고인은 피해 자를 마을버스 우측면 앞부분으로 충격한 후 우측 뒷바퀴로 역과하여 피해자로 하여금 약 12 주간의 치료를 요하는 중상을 입게 한 점, ② 당시 피해자는, ㉠ 외상성 쇼크 및 저혈 량성 쇼크, ㉡ 외상성 혈 복강, ㉢ 간 열상, ㉣ 다발성 늑골 골절( 우 측 7번 ~ 11번), ㉤ 다발성 척추 골절( 흉추 6번 ~ 11번, 요추 5번), ㉥ 천추 장골 관절 손상, ㉦ 우측 장골 골절, ㉧ 우측 절구의 골절, ㉨ 양 측 골반 골 가지의 골절, ㉩ 골 반골 골절에 의한 출혈, ㉪ 우측 대퇴 신경의 손상, ㉫ 전신에 걸친 다발성 타박상 및 염좌 진단을 받았으며, 그로 인해 지혈을 위한 응급 혈관 조영술 및 색 전술을 시행하였던 점, ③ 당시 피해자에게는 심각한 혈압 저하 및 쇼크 증상으로 인해 사망의 위험성이 있었던 점에 비추어 볼 때 피해자에게 신체의 상해로 인하여 생명에 대한 위험이 발생하였다고
It is reasonable to view it.
B. Therefore, the prosecutor's above assertion is with merit.
3. In conclusion, the prosecutor's appeal is with merit, and the judgment of the court below is reversed in accordance with Article 364 (6) of the Criminal Procedure Act, and it is so decided as follows through a new theory of change.
Criminal facts
The defendant is a person who is engaged in driving a village bus No. 33 of the village traffic in C (State).
On June 5, 2014, the Defendant is driving a village bus around 16:30.