However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for one year from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

At around 01:50 on May 18, 2014, the Defendant: (a) placed in Seo-gu, Seo-gu, Chungcheongnam-gu, Chungcheongnam-gu, Chungcheongnam-gu; (b) laid off all clothes from panty under the influence of alcohol and return home to the panty; and (c) without any reason, she gets back from the victim E (27 years of age) who is the chief executive officer of the D District Police Agency of the YY and called “Y-gu, Haak-gu, Haak-gu, Haak-gu.”

구를 받자, 피해자에게 “이런 씨발 짭새, 개새끼, 양말이나 주워와라” 라고 욕설을 하고, 한손으로 피해자의 멱살을 잡고, 다른 한손으로 자신의 신발로 피해자를 때릴 듯이 폭행하였다.

Accordingly, the Defendant interfered with the legitimate execution of duties concerning the handling of the victim's 112 reported case.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Statement of the police statement of E;

1. Application of statutes to photographs of victimized police officers;

1. Article 136 (1) of the Criminal Act applicable to the crimes and Article 136 of the Election of Imprisonment;

1. It is so decided as per Disposition on the grounds of Article 62(1) of the Criminal Act (such as the fact that police officers want to take the defendant's wife against the defendant, the fact that the defendant made a confession and reflects his depth of his mistake, and the defendant has no criminal record of suspended execution or more).