2. According to the CCTV video recorded by the court, according to the judgment of the court, the Defendant was seated along with his string, and the mobile phone cited by E was removed in front from the front, and was laid down on the floor of the place where he was installed for the purpose of ornamental use.

E knee knee knee knee knee knee knee knee knee knee knee knee knee knee knee in the left side of E by extending away the left arms into hand, etc.

E was sent to the Defendant once, and the Defendant saw that he was able to go to this end.

However, E continued to go in the direction of moving back to the original place.

After the defendant's friendship with E in his/her hand, he/she passed through two female employees, who return to the defendant.

In response to this, the defendant was consistent to the investigation agency and the court, and there was no intention to commit an indecent act on the part of the defendant in order to resisting water from the wind with water coming from water.

The argument is asserted.

The move of the defendant, E, employee, and defendant who had been before and after physical contact occurring in the video is identical to the above and conforms to the defendant's argument.

영상에서 보이는 피고인의 손 움직임은 손등으로 E를 한 대 툭 친 것에 가깝고 공소사실 기재와 같이 엉덩이를 쓸 듯이 만졌다 고는 보이지 않는다.

E even though there are little confusions with its statements, this Court stated in this Court that “the Defendant was sponsed with the clothes of the Defendant,” following the physical contact immediately after CCTV images appear in the video.

was stated.