The judgment below

Upon examining the reasoning in light of the record, the court below is just to have rejected the defendant's assertion on the mental and physical disorder on the grounds of its stated reasoning, and there is no error of misconception of facts or misapprehension of the legal principles as

Meanwhile, according to the records, the defendant appealed against the judgment of the first instance, and asserted only mental and physical disorder and unreasonable sentencing as the grounds for appeal.

In such a case, the argument that there is an error of mistake in the judgment of the court below shall not be a legitimate ground for appeal.

In addition, under Article 383 subparagraph 4 of the Criminal Procedure Act, only in cases where death penalty, life imprisonment, or imprisonment or imprisonment without prison labor for not less than ten years has been imposed, an appeal on the grounds of unfair sentencing is allowed. Thus, in this case where a more minor sentence has been imposed on the defendant, the argument that the amount of punishment is unreasonable

Therefore, the appeal is dismissed. It is so decided as per Disposition by the assent of all participating Justices on the bench.