On March 12, 2013, the Defendant stated to the effect that “In the Mreal estate office operated by a licensed real estate agent L in K in Jung-gu, Seoul, the victimO who intends to rent 102 I building 102 for the establishment of a pharmacy,” “In the case of the I building 102, the I building is a trust property, and the trust company is a trust company, and a trust company is not subject to a lease contract. However, there is no legal problem in the lease contract that only receives a rent without a deposit. The sub-face may be placed without the consent of an international trust company. The sub-party may be placed without the monthly rent of KRW 500,00,000 and KRW 90,000,000,000,000 won for the 18-month month, would be able to use without any problem.”

However, in fact, a trust contract cannot be concluded without the prior consent of an international trust company, which is a trustee under a trust contract, and a trust contract which was concluded without the prior consent of a trust company, is not effective against a trust company. Thus, a lease contract cannot be concluded even without the prior consent of an international trust company, and even if it is concluded, it cannot be asserted the validity of a lease contract against an international trust company. Thus, the victim entered into a lease contract with the defendant on the I building 102 (hereinafter “instant commercial building”), but could not be used as a legitimate lessee.

Nevertheless, the defendant deceivings the victim as above and is subject to a fee from the victim.