손해배상 등
1. The plaintiffs' appeals against the defendants are all dismissed.
2. The costs of appeal are assessed against the Plaintiffs.
1. The reasons for the court’s explanation of this case are as follows, except for the addition of the judgment on the plaintiffs’ assertion added in the trial of the court of first instance, and therefore, it is consistent with the reasoning of the judgment of the court of first instance pursuant to the main sentence of Article 420 of the Civil Procedure Act.
【The part to be determined additionally】 As Defendant C agreed to pay the Plaintiffs KRW 29.7 million to the Plaintiffs in the course of being investigated into the relevant criminal case on December 16, 2014, and compensate them for the Plaintiffs’ damages caused by his embezzlement, Defendant C has the obligation to pay the Plaintiffs the money stated in the claim.
However, the evidence submitted by the plaintiffs alone is insufficient to recognize that Defendant C had agreed to the plaintiffs as alleged, and there is no other evidence to acknowledge this. Therefore, the above assertion by the plaintiffs is without merit.
2. The judgment of the first instance court is justifiable, and all appeals against the Defendants are dismissed.