1. On April 27, 2016, the Defendant committed the crime of injury: (a) around 18:50 on the victim F (53) of the victim F (53) in Gangseo-si, Gangnam-si; (b) completed the instant restaurant; and (c) discovered the victim who was in the said restaurant; and (d) thought the victim had expressed his desire to the Defendant’s wife for about three months before the victim was able to do so; (b) entered the victim’s restaurant with the victim “I am, I am, I am, I am, I am, I am, I am, I am, I am, I am, I am.”; and (c) the victim tried to show the Defendant to the outside of the said restaurant, “I am under the influence of the Defendant, I am, I am am, I am am the victim’s hair, and am on the part of the victim’s hair, such as the victim’s hair’s hair’s s s s s s hair, etc.

2. The Defendant, at the time, at the place specified in the above 1. Paragraph 1 above, destroyed the victim’s property by leaving 22,00 won in total of the market value of the victim’s possession, which was located in front of the restaurant, where h in the above cafeteria h h c c c c c c c c c c c c c c c c c c c c c c c c c c c c c c c c c c

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Statement made by the police with regard to F;

1. All on-site photographs;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes to each investigation report (to attach a written diagnosis of injury to a victim and a estimates of food waste bage);

1. An injury to a criminal fact by relevant legal provisions and a judgment of choice of punishment: An injury to a property prescribed in Article 257 (1) of the Criminal Act: Article 366 of the Criminal Act;

1. Article 37 (former part of Article 37, Article 38 (1) 2, and Article 50 of the Criminal Act (within the scope of the sum of the long-term punishments of two crimes as indicated in the holding, aggravated punishment for concurrent crimes).