협박
The prosecution of this case is dismissed.
1. The summary of the facts charged is that the Defendant, as a real estate broker, was aware of the Victim C (the age of 55) by acting as an intermediary for singing places. However, the Defendant, who was not the Defendant, was dissatisfied with the defective victim of a singing business contract through another real estate broker, other than the Defendant.
On September 5, 2016, the Defendant called “E Real Estate” office operated by the Defendant in Seoul Special Metropolitan City, Nowon-gu, a “E Real Estate” office, and entered into a contract with the Defendant for the real estate that is open to the public. We look at in the future, and threatened the victim.”
Around September 30, 2016, the Defendant called “E Real Estate” office to the victim and threatened the victim with “I shall die. If I die within, I shall do so even if I die, I shall die.”
On October 3, 2016, the Defendant called “E Real Estate” to the victim at the “E Real Estate Office” office around October 3, 2016.
(v) A person who wishes to do harm shall do so, and is also required.
No person may die after others.
The victim threatened the victim by stating that “the death of the victim before.”
On November 8, 2016, the Defendant called the victim at the “E Real Estate Office” office and extracted the knife knife knife knife knife from the victim.
It goes beyond the match.
Does it be the time to file a complaint by intimidation.
The victim threatened the victim by stating that he had no son only, and that he talks about.”
Accordingly, the defendant threatened the victim four times in total.
2. The crime of intimidation is a crime falling under Article 283(1) of the Criminal Act and cannot be prosecuted against the victim’s express intent under Article 283(3) of the Criminal Act. Since the victim has withdrawn his/her wish to punish the Defendant in the court on August 25, 2017, the prosecution of this case is to be instituted pursuant to Article 327(6) of the Criminal Procedure Act.