Therefore, the defendant is obligated to implement the registration procedure for transfer of ownership on January 10, 1988 with respect to the land No. 1 of this case to the plaintiff.

2. The Plaintiff asserted that, on January 10, 1988, the Defendant donated not only the land of this case but also the land of this case listed in Schedule 1, 2, 3, 5, 6, 8, 9, and 11 (hereinafter collectively referred to as “instant land”) to the Plaintiff on January 10, 198, and that the Defendant filed a claim against the Defendant for the implementation of the procedure for the registration of ownership transfer for the land of this case 2 as to the land of this case on January 10, 198.

In full view of the overall purport of the pleadings and videos of evidence Nos. 1 through 5, Eul evidence Nos. 1 through 5, Eul evidence Nos. 1, 2, and 4 (including the number of branch numbers), the Defendant’s attached property donated to the Plaintiff on January 16, 1982, such as donation of a lot of property to the Plaintiff on January 16, 1982, including donation of a lot of land D forest No. 50,791 square meters; ② on January 16, 1982, the Defendant also donated a lot of property to the Plaintiff on January 16, 1982; ③ the land No. 1 donated to the Plaintiff was used as a passage leading to the Defendant’s operation; ④ the land No. 2 was adjacent to the same side of the land of this case; ⑤ the Plaintiff filed a claim for the transfer registration of ownership against the Defendant, etc. for the preservation of the right to claim the transfer registration of ownership under donation, and the disposition of deposit No. 1, 2000,200.