청구이의
1. The plaintiff's claim is dismissed.
2. The costs of lawsuit shall be borne by the Plaintiff.
1. The Defendant (Appointed Party) and the Appointor C filed a lawsuit against the Plaintiff to the effect that “the Plaintiff was not paid wages from the Defendant under the Suwon District Court Decision 2014Da3869, Suwon District Court Decision 2014Da3869, supra, that “the Plaintiff shall pay to the Defendant (Appointed Party) the amount calculated at the rate of 20% per annum from August 15, 2012 to the date of full payment with respect to each of the above amounts,” and the said court issued the recommendations for performance on September 11, 2014, and became final and conclusive on September 30, 2014.
[Grounds for recognition] Gap evidence No. 1 and the purport of the whole pleading
2. The Plaintiff’s assertion and determination that with the consent of the Defendant (Appointed) and the Appointed C, the Plaintiff agreed to pay the above wages directly to the Defendant (Appointed Party) and the Appointed C as the remainder of the construction work to be paid by the owner to the Plaintiff, and that the agreement was reached between the Plaintiff, the Defendant (Appointed Party) and the Appointed C.
Therefore, in full view of the purport of Gap evidence No. 2 and the whole pleadings, the plaintiff prepared a letter of waiver to the effect that the owner shall pay 20,000,000 won to the defendant (appointed party) and wages of 3,50,000,000 won to the appointed party C in the presence of D, but it is not sufficient to recognize that the owner is exempted from the obligation of wage payment to the defendant (appointed party) or the appointed party C in lieu of paying the wages of the defendant (appointed party) and the appointed party C, and there is no other evidence to acknowledge this otherwise, the plaintiff's above assertion is without merit.
In addition, the plaintiff is 500,000 won out of the above 3,000,000 won by the defendant (appointed party).