Defendant

B was discovered in around 1967 in front of the main gate of the Victim E (Inn, 87 years old), and was adopted to the injured couple. A around May 2007, after the death of F, the husband of the injured party with both side interest of Defendant B, the injured party was dissolved between the injured party and the injured party, and the Defendant A was the wife of Defendant B.

The Defendants knew that Defendant B, who received the inheritance from F, 2.5 billion won of the miscarriages in the amount of 2.5 billion won, all of the entertainment expenses and the illegal entertainment room businesses, etc. for three years, and that the injured party maintains the inherited property under the circumstances of the purchase of the entire years, and conspired to use the victim’s property by deceiving the victim’s property by acquiring the victim’s property by acquiring the victim’s property, by finding the victim as if he were aware of the past mistake in around 2011.

1. From January 2013, the Defendants indicated “30 million won in the bill of indictment in February 2015, 100 million won” to the victim’s house located in Nam-gu Incheon Metropolitan City, Nam-gu. However, in light of the description of the written complaint, it is evident that the Defendant is a clerical error in “ February 2015”.

The principal shall be paid up to the full payment and 200 million won shall be paid with interest of KRW 9 million each year and the principal shall be returned later.

“The horses were delivered KRW 300,000 to the agricultural cooperatives located in the Nam-gu Incheon Metropolitan City, Nam-gu around the 10th day of the same month from the trusted victims.”

However, the Defendants merely thought that they would use the said money as their living expenses or entertainment expenses, and did not have any intent or ability to pay the said money or to manage the deposits.

Accordingly, the Defendants deceptioned the victim as above and acquired 300 million won from the victim.

2. The Defendants would be able to receive the pension paid by the injured party to the aged in the home of the injured party on January 2013, 2013.

There is no pension for real estate in the name of the victim.