2. Although there is a record of punishment for the same kind of crime, the fact that the defendant has repeatedly committed the theft of the same method that steals money and valuables in an unrecovered vehicle only once with the unrecovered vehicle, etc. is disadvantageous to the defendant.

However, in full view of the following factors: (a) the Defendant led to the instant crime; (b) the amount of damage is not so significant; (c) the victims were voluntarily agreed at F, H, K, and the lower court; (d) there was no history of criminal punishment heavier than a suspended sentence due to the same type of crime; and (e) other various sentencing conditions as shown in the records and arguments, such as the Defendant’s age, family environment, and circumstances before and after the instant crime, the lower court’s sentence against the Defendant is too une

3. If so, the prosecutor's appeal is without merit, and it is dismissed under Article 364 (4) of the Criminal Procedure Act. It is so decided as per Disposition.