징계처분 취소
1. The plaintiff's appeal is dismissed.
2. The costs of appeal shall be borne by the Plaintiff.
Purport of claim and appeal
Defendant on 2016.
1. The reasoning of the court’s explanation concerning this case is as follows, except for the dismissal or addition of some of the reasons of the judgment of the court of first instance, and thus, it is identical to the entry in the column of reasons of the judgment of the court of first instance. Thus, it is acceptable in accordance with Article 8(2) of the Administrative Litigation Act and Article 420 of the Civil Procedure Act.
Part 8 7 to 9 " was without the deceased's stress," and " was taken as much as possible to prevent the deceased from stress, and the deceased was first placed in his/her own team, so it is clearly necessary to take measures to ensure that the deceased does not engage in his/her business of selling the deceased's mixed, etc. during the period of adaptation."
B. The Plaintiff asserts that the Plaintiff cannot be held responsible for direction and supervision over F cannot be established unless there is any error or illegality by the Defendant F of the elective Disease F. Therefore, in this case, it is common sense that the Plaintiff is subject to the Plaintiff’s instruction and supervision as to whether there is an error against the appointed soldier F. As to whether there is an error, “Appointment F is ordinarily transferred,” and “Appointment F is not included in the duty.” On several occasions from the Administrative Dissemination Officer, the Plaintiff cannot be held responsible for direction and supervision as to the Plaintiff, in addition to evidence, such as evidence, such as the testimony by the relevant person, etc.
2. In conclusion, the judgment of the court of first instance is legitimate, and the plaintiff's appeal is dismissed as it is without merit. It is so decided as per Disposition.