However, the execution of the above sentence shall be suspended for a period of one year from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

On March 4, 2016, from around 17:20 to 18:16 of the same day, the Defendant, while working for the police station located in Ansan-si B, Asan-si, B, had "the police officer who was drunk, flap, flap, flap, flap, flap, flap, flaped."

"Absing off the floor by taking a bath and taking a bath, and the police box belonging to the above police box recommended him to have him returned home, and the face of the above D was taken once again, and he was worn by her.

Accordingly, the defendant assaulted a police officer who is performing legitimate duties in relation to the prevention and suppression of crimes and interfered with his/her execution of duties.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes on police statements made to D;

1. Relevant Article 136 of the Criminal Act concerning the facts constituting an offense and Article 136 (1) of the Criminal Act concerning the selection of punishment;

1. Reasons for sentencing under Article 62(1) of the Criminal Act on the suspension of execution [the scope of recommended punishment]; consideration of the following: (a) the basic area (from June to January 1) (the person who is subject to a special sentencing] that has no basic area (the person who is subject to a special sentencing for a period of six months) [the decision of sentence]; and (b) the fact that there is no special criminal record other than once of a fine, etc.