청소년보호법위반
Defendant shall be punished by a fine of two million won.
If the defendant does not pay the above fine, the amount of KRW 100,000 shall be paid.
Punishment of the crime
The defendant is a person who operates a general restaurant with the trade name D from the 1st floor of the Sinnam-si, Sungnam-si.
No person shall sell or lend drugs, etc. harmful to juveniles to juveniles or provide them free of charge.
Nevertheless, the Defendant:
1. On January 11, 2016, a series of hours: (a) sell three weeks of cattle harmful to juveniles to E (one-five years of age), F (one-six years of age), and G (one-five years of age), a young juvenile, who has been a guest at the above restaurant at his/her own time, for three thousand won per week; (b) sell three weeks of cattle harmful to juveniles at the bar;
2. On January 22, 2016, around 00:15, around 00:15, a juvenile H (n, 14 years of age), who was a guest, (n, 16 years of age), J (n, 15 years of age) K (n, n, n, 15 years of age), etc., sold to 3,00 won per week a juvenile harmful drug.
Summary of Evidence
1. Partial statement of the defendant;
1. Each legal statement of the witness E, F, G, H, I, J, and K;
1. A copy of the performance control report;
1. A certificate of business report;
1. Determination as to the assertion of the defendant and defense counsel who taken on-site photographs and the appearance of the witness
1. The defendant and his defense counsel set aside the crime of this case for the following reasons.
A. First, the Defendant accepted the instant D on January 16, 2016, and committed the crime on January 11, 2016, the Defendant was irrelevant to the Defendant, and the Defendant did not sell alcohol to E, F, and G on January 11, 2016.
B. The Defendant was merely selling alcohol to the above juveniles, since the Defendant was aware of the identification card of the juveniles who previously posted on his restaurant, and was found to have been adult. There was no intention in violation of the Juvenile Protection Act.
2. The following circumstances are acknowledged based on each of the aforementioned evidence as to whether the Defendant sold sub-principals to E, etc. on January 11, 2016, namely, (i) the Defendant is recognized as having completed the registration of a business owner from January 16, 2016, which was subsequent to the instant case, as D’s business owner, but Article 59 Subparag. 6 and Article 28(1) of the Juvenile Protection Act provides that any person shall be punished if he/she sells harmful drugs to juveniles, and the subject of punishment shall be punished.