However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

On July 15, 2015, around 23:00, the Defendant boarded the E-si operated by D around Sckib in Busan Seo-gu, Busan, and divingd, and the said D did not know the destination, thereby making a report to the G district located in F in Busan Young-gu.

At around 23:30 on the same day, the Defendant expressed a bath to the victim, who was in a taxi where H was working at the said GD zone, who was in a position at the said GD zone, and served in the said GD zone, was fluored by the fluor of the fluor of the fluor of the fluor of the fluor of the fluor of the fluor of the fluor of the fluor of the fluor of the H, and the fluor of the fluor of the fluor of the f

Accordingly, the Defendant interfered with the legitimate execution of duties concerning the crime prevention of H.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Application of the police statement law to H

1. Article 136 (1) of the Criminal Act applicable to the relevant criminal facts (the occupation of obstruction of performance of official duties and the choice of imprisonment);

1. Suspension of execution under Article 62 (1) of the Criminal Act (Article 62 (1) of the Criminal Act (Article 62 (1) of the Act on the Suspension of Execution shall be sentenced in consideration of the following: although it is not good to the nature of a crime committed by a police officer in the course of performing his/her duties, it shall be sentenced to suspension of execution in consideration of the fact that the police officer's conviction was made, that the police officer was fined, that the police officer

1. Social service order under Article 62-2 of the Criminal Act;