When the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.

At around 23:40 on January 9, 2015, the Defendant: (a) requested the police officer who was in charge of the Defendant’s assault case to return home; and (b) caused the Defendant’s damage to KRW 2.50,00 of the repair cost by walking back the front pentel part of the E- which was used by the public office where the Defendant was making a stop at the same time.

Accordingly, the Defendant damaged the goods used by public offices.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Statement prepared by the F;

1. A statement in a written estimate;

1. Application of image Acts and subordinate statutes to damaged photographs;

1. Relevant Article of the Criminal Act and Article 141 (1) of the Criminal Act concerning the selection of penalties;

1. Articles 70 (1) and 69 (2) of the Criminal Act for the detention of a workhouse;

1. The same type of punishment as the order shall be determined in consideration of the circumstances unfavorable to the defendant who has a intellectual disorder in the sentencing reason of Article 334(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act in consideration of the fact that the defendant has been subject to punishment by hindering the performance of official duties or destroying and damaging property in the past.