폭력행위등처벌에관한법률위반(집단ㆍ흉기등상해)등
The judgment below
Part concerning Defendant B and A among them shall be reversed.
Defendant
B B Imprisonment with prison labor of one year and six months, and Defendant A.
1. Summary of grounds for appeal;
A. In full view of the prosecutor's statements of the victim B and the victim Eul who made a mistake of facts against the defendant Eul and the defendant Eul's wife as well as the defendant Eul's statements of the court of first instance, the court below acquitted the defendants of the violation of the Punishment of Violences, etc. Act (the "Joint Injury"), although it is sufficiently recognized that the defendant Eul, as well as the defendant Eul, made a physical fighting, such as the victim's physical fighting that the defendant C had taken the victim's body, and the victim's escape was caused by the victim's frighting of the victim's body, and the victim's defect H made the victim's escape to the victim's frighting of the victim.
B. Defendant B’s assertion of mental disorder was under the influence of alcohol at the time of committing a crime of violation of the Punishment of Violences, etc. Act (a group, deadly weapon, etc.).
C. The lower court’s sentence on Defendant B and A’s assertion of unfair sentencing (Defendant B: Imprisonment with prison labor for one year and six months, and fine of one million won for Defendant A) is excessively unreasonable.
2. Judgment on the prosecutor's grounds for appeal
A. On October 20, 2012, at around 23:8, 2012, Defendant A and C met the victim’s face, etc. due to drinking and spaw at the G frequency house located in F in Suwon-gu, Suwon-si, Suwon-si. The Defendant A spawns the victim’s spawn. The Defendant A spawns the victim’s bat, fats the victim’s bat, fats the victim’s bat, fats the victim’s bat, and the victim fats the victim’s breast part of the Defendant A’s chest.
As a result, Defendant A and C jointly inflicted bodily injury, such as an in-facel, in which the period of treatment cannot be known to the victim.
B. The judgment of the court below is different from the victim B, who corresponds to the facts charged by the defendant C when the defendant C was in combination with the defendant A, and the court's oral statement is different.