2. Where there is no change in the conditions of sentencing compared to the judgment of the first instance court, and the sentencing of the first instance court does not deviate from the reasonable scope of discretion, it is reasonable to respect the sentencing of the first instance court as an appellate court.

(See Supreme Court en banc Decision 2015Do3260 Decided July 23, 2015). The Defendant recognized and reflected the instant crime.

The defendant has no history of criminal punishment heavier than suspended execution.

However, for about three years, the Defendant embezzled the victim's property over 1100 times, and the sum of the damages reaches about 65 million won.

The victim was not recovered from damage, and the defendant was not able to receive a letter.

In addition, comprehensively taking account of various conditions of sentencing, such as Defendant’s age, health status, environment, family relationship, circumstances after the crime, and consequences, and there are no special circumstances or changes in circumstances that may change the sentencing of the lower court following the lower judgment, the sentence imposed by the lower court cannot be deemed unfair beyond the scope of reasonable discretion.

The defendant's assertion of unfair sentencing is without merit.

3. The defendant's appeal is without merit and thus dismissed pursuant to Article 364 (4) of the Criminal Procedure Act. It is so decided as per Disposition.