2. The following circumstances acknowledged by the evidence duly adopted and examined by the lower court, namely, ① the victim spit the four-story toilet in the investigative agency and the lower court’s court’s trial on the present situation at the time of the instant case, stating that “the victim spits and spits the toilets on the fourth floor” with the Defendant’s “use of the toilets on the fourth floor”, and the Defendant spits his head on the floor after the Defendant spits his head, thereby spreading his head on the floor and cutting his head on his hand.

In this regard, "I am, I am, I am."

"A man who had a head and had been in the vicinity of the defendant," and himself/herself escaped out of the toilet.

“A statement” has been made specifically and consistently to the effect that it was “(30-31 pages of the trial records, 11 pages of the evidence records),” and ② Harman I in an investigative agency on the present situation at the time of the instant case “no person exists” on the side of the male toilet;

A statement (Evidence No. 8-9) stating that “I see the victim’s lusium, I see that I see the victim’s lusium in male toilets, and that I see that I am the victim when I am the victim while I am the victim while I am the victim.” This corresponds to the above statement of the victim, ③ there is no special motive to see the victim’s unflusing violence with the victim by falsity, and ④ there is no special motive to see the defendant. ④ The defendant also fighting in the investigative agency, such as fighting with the victim, and fighting with each other, while I am the victim’s head, the victim was flusing the victim’s head, while I am the victim.