정보공개거부처분취소
1. The Defendant’s decision to disclose each information to the Plaintiffs on February 5, 2016 is revoked.
2. The costs of the lawsuit are assessed against the defendant.
1. Details of the disposition;
A. On January 13, 2012, the Seoul Southern District Court rendered a judgment against the Plaintiff on January 2013, 2012, where 156 employees, including the Plaintiffs (hereinafter referred to as “ Both vehicles”) filed a lawsuit, such as nullification of dismissal, against both vehicles.
The plaintiffs et al. appealed against the above judgment of the first instance, and the Seoul High Court revoked the above judgment of the first instance as of February 7, 2014 and sentenced the plaintiff's winning judgment.
The two automobiles filed an appeal against the above appellate judgment, and the Supreme Court rendered a judgment of reversal and return as of November 13, 2014, which rendered a judgment of reversal and return as of November 13, 2014, the Seoul High Court rendered a judgment dismissing the appeal by the plaintiffs, etc. as of May 27, 2016.
Accordingly, the Plaintiffs, etc. appealed with the Supreme Court Decision 2016Da29944 Decided July 12, 2016, but the Supreme Court dismissed the Plaintiffs, etc.’ appeal on September 28, 2016.
(hereinafter referred to as "relevant civil procedure"). (b)
On the other hand, on February 19, 2014, after the judgment of the appellate court for the reversal, transmission, and transmission, the Financial Supervisory Service drafted a document (hereinafter “instant information”) stating “the analysis and review of the judgment related to the second instance of the lawsuit for the invalidation of dismissal of a pair of motor vehicles company” (hereinafter “instant information”).
C. On January 27, 2016, the Plaintiffs filed a claim with the Defendant for disclosure of the instant information, but the Defendant on February 5, 2016, the Defendant: (a) “Disclosure of the supervision-related report prepared by the Financial Supervisory Service may seriously interfere with the fair performance of supervisory duties; and (b) the report includes information corresponding to the management and trade secrets of the company subject to supervision; and (c) The report also includes information related to the current trial and is likely to affect the deliberation or trial results if disclosed.”