A shall be punished by a fine for negligence of KRW 4,000,000, and by a fine of KRW 3,000,000.

The Defendants respectively.

Defendant

A is a person who operates a "D Game Center" on the second and second floor in Masan-si, and Defendant B is a person who works as an employee of Defendant A from the above "D Game Center" to the above "D Game Center."

No one shall engage in the business of converting into money or arranging exchange or re-purchase of tangible or intangible results obtained through the use of game water.

Nevertheless, Defendant A from February 15, 2017 to the same year

8. By February 2, 200 (Defendant B from May 2017 to May 2017 with Defendant A)

8. Before February, 8) In the aforementioned “D Game Chapter,” 30 games, 20 games, 20 games, 10 games, and 10 games, etc., and if an unspecified customer requests to set up a total of 60 games, such as 30 games, 30 games, 20 games, and 10 games, the said games were exchanged in cash by settling the game scores as 1 won per point to the customer.

As a result, the Defendants conspired to exchange tangible and intangible results obtained through the use of game water for business purposes.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendants’ respective legal statements

1. Police seizure records and list of seizure;

1. Investigation report (to be accompanied by preparing compliance disks for non-expact video recording devices);

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes on site photographs within and outside the D game site;

1. Article 44 (1) 2 and Article 32 (1) 7 of the Act on the Promotion of Game Industry, Article 30 of the Criminal Act concerning criminal facts;

1. Selection of each selective fine for punishment (the fact that there is no past record of the same type of crime);

1. Article 70(1) and Article 69(2) of the Criminal Act for the attraction of a workhouse;

1. Defendant A: Article 48(1)1 and 2 of the Criminal Act, Article 44(2) of the Game Industry Promotion Act;

1. The sentencing conditions indicated in the records, such as the business period, sales amount, the degree of the Defendants’ participation, the environment, and the circumstances after the commission of the crime, under Article 334(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act, of the provisional payment order, shall be determined as set forth in the text.