However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

[criminal power] On December 30, 2008, the Defendant received a summary order of KRW 2 million for a crime of violating the Road Traffic Act (driving) from the Jung-gu District Court Goyang Branch on December 30, 2008, and a summary order of KRW 2 million for the same crime in the same court on February 19, 2013, respectively.

【Criminal Facts】

On April 25, 2013, at around 23:17, the Defendant driven a C-A-A-A-A-A-A-A-A-A-A-A-A-A-A-A-A-A-A-A-A-A-A-A-A-A-A-A-A-A-A-A-A-A-A-A-A-A-A-A-A-A-

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. A protocol concerning the police interrogation of the accused;

1. An inquiry into the results of the control of drinking driving, a report on the state of drinking drivers, and an appraisal report on the concentration of blood alcohol;

1. Previous convictions indicated in judgment: Application of Acts and subordinate statutes concerning criminal records and investigation reports (a summary order of the same criminal records);

1. Relevant law concerning the crime, Articles 148-2 (1) 1 and 44 (1) of the Road Traffic Act, the decision to punish a person with prison labor (including the fact that a person drives a motor vehicle while driving a motor vehicle at the same time within three months after he/she was sentenced to the previous fine and the fact that he/she is high in drinking water);

1. Mitigation of discretionary punishment under Articles 53 and 55 (1) 3 of the Criminal Act (general circumstances, such as the fact that the accused repents the wrongness and has no record of criminal punishment exceeding the fine, etc.);

1. Article 62 (1) of the Criminal Act (Discretionary Reasons for Discretionary mitigation);

1. It is so decided as per Disposition on the grounds of Article 62-2 of the Criminal Act or more of orders to provide community service and attend lectures;